MEMBERS
  1. Gavagai
  2. Sherlock Holmes The Voice
  3. Supergirl Season 2
  4. Wednesday, 17 May 2017
Am I the only one who thought that Winn didn't think it all the way through when he came up with the lead gas? Because lead dust would be harmful to humans (and dogs, as well as other animals) to breathe too.

Does Supergirl take place in a world where humans aren't susceptible to lead poisoning? Because lead poisoning is definitely a thing in the real world, and The Flint Water Crisis has been in the news for the past three years, so it would be an odd thing for the writers to forget/ be unaware of.

So... What's up with that???
Don't assume malice when stupidity is an adequate explanation. At least, not the first time.
Accepted Answer Pending Moderation
0
Votes
Undo
This being on a show about an alien who looks exactly like a person, and can shoot lasers, fly and is invincible, where solar energy can be made into a "sun bomb", and space portals exist, I don't think little scientific oversight matters that much
  1. more than a month ago
  2. Supergirl Season 2
  3. # 1
Accepted Answer Pending Moderation
0
Votes
Undo
James undoubtedly had filters in his mask courtesy of Winn, and both he and Cat were out of the "line of fire" of the dust spray.

I'm pretty sure you worry about decontamination after you get rid of the murderous, superpowered alien invaders who are trying to kill you.

Priorities.
  1. more than a month ago
  2. Supergirl Season 2
  3. # 2
Accepted Answer Pending Moderation
0
Votes
Undo
James undoubtedly had filters in his mask courtesy of Winn, and both he and Cat were out of the "line of fire" of the dust spray.

I'm pretty sure you worry about decontamination after you get rid of the murderous, superpowered alien invaders who are trying to kill you.

Priorities.

Yeah, but Winn could have just as easily handed James a gun with lead bullets. At least with bullets you don't have to worry about an ill-timed breeze blowing them back at you, or the people you are trying to protect.
Don't assume malice when stupidity is an adequate explanation. At least, not the first time.
  1. more than a month ago
  2. Supergirl Season 2
  3. # 3
Accepted Answer Pending Moderation
0
Votes
Undo
"....I don't think little scientific oversight matters that much"

Well. "little", yes - but when you're dealing with something as obvious and well-known as lead poisoning, I'd say you should at least acknowledge it (if you expect the audience to buy into the storyline). At least that's the way I would have written it (but maybe that's just the science teacher in me talking there). :)

"Yeah, but Winn could have just as easily handed James a gun with lead bullets. At least with bullets you don't have to worry about an ill-timed breeze blowing them back at you, or the people you are trying to protect."

Agreed - I would have had someone mention that people should stay out of the line of fire (unless they were wearing some sort of filter or gas mask). And then someone else could say, "Hey, Winn - why not just use regular lead bullets!"
  1. more than a month ago
  2. Supergirl Season 2
  3. # 4
Accepted Answer Pending Moderation
0
Votes
Undo
Agree, a gun would've been much more effective.
  1. more than a month ago
  2. Supergirl Season 2
  3. # 5
Accepted Answer Pending Moderation
0
Votes
Undo
Dosage. Daxamites are ultrasensitive. For humans it is not ideal, but the dosage was really small. Or it was an organolead compount (some organometallic compounds are really nasty, e.g., arsines).
  1. more than a month ago
  2. Supergirl Season 2
  3. # 6
Accepted Answer Pending Moderation
0
Votes
Undo
Being where lead is a heavy metal and causes massive issues for the average human, not by a full-blown massive one shot dose, although that would indeed mess up a person's day, but by long-term exposure bits at a time, this plot point was utterly ridiculous. Not only will it be in the atmosphere, but It will be in the water supply, in the food supply and everywhere else on the planet that isn't air tight.

Dumbest bunch of geniuses ever on this show. Pretty much a scorched earth contingency.
  1. more than a month ago
  2. Supergirl Season 2
  3. # 7
Accepted Answer Pending Moderation
0
Votes
Undo
Dosage. Daxamites are ultrasensitive. For humans it is not ideal, but the dosage was really small. Or it was an organolead compount (some organometallic compounds are really nasty, e.g., arsines).


Or it could have been something even simpler: a (very) dilute solution of lead nitrate. But even so, I feel that the audience deserved an explanation. Perhaps someone could have said, "Hey, Winn - isn't lead toxic to humans, too?" To which Winn would reply, "Yeah - but the amount of lead in this spray is way too low to have any kind of an effect on humans. But Daxamtes are so sensitive to it that even this tiny bit will kill them!"
  1. more than a month ago
  2. Supergirl Season 2
  3. # 8
Accepted Answer Pending Moderation
0
Votes
Undo
Being where lead is a heavy metal and causes massive issues for the average human, not by a full-blown massive one shot dose, although that would indeed mess up a person's day, but by long-term exposure bits at a time, this plot point was utterly ridiculous. Not only will it be in the atmosphere, but It will be in the water supply, in the food supply and everywhere else on the planet that isn't air tight.
/quote]

Yes, again - I believe that the audience was owed an explanation. They could have just had the "shower of lead particles" followed by a later "decontamination spray" from the same box that would then take the lead out of the atmosphere (after the Daxamites have already been killed off, of course).
  1. more than a month ago
  2. Supergirl Season 2
  3. # 9
Accepted Answer Pending Moderation
0
Votes
Undo


Yes, again - I believe that the audience was owed an explanation. They could have just had the "shower of lead particles" followed by a later "decontamination spray" from the same box that would then take the lead out of the atmosphere (after the Daxamites have already been killed off, of course).


That would require more effort on the show runners part, I'm afraid. I have been a bit harsh on the show this year after being one of it's more staunch supporters in season one, so I will give them that they are perhaps dumbing things down to keep it more palatable to younger children. They would be WRONG to think that way, but at least it would excuse the apparent laziness (or incompetence) in their story telling.
  1. more than a month ago
  2. Supergirl Season 2
  3. # 10
Accepted Answer Pending Moderation
0
Votes
Undo
They said in the episode that the amount was not enough to be harmful to humans.

It may be something similar to how most steel in the real world is contaminated with radioactive dust from the nuclear bomb tests over the years, but it's at a level not generally harmful to people.

If they really need to explain it away later on they can just say that the lead will settle out of the atmosphere over time or something and not be a long term problem. Or, the lead was a lead isotope or molecule or something that's harmful to Daxamites but not humans.
Imra: "What about Tommy and Gina? 'You live for the fight when it's all that you've got!'"

Mon El: "Bon Jovi."

Imra: "Or was that all a lie?"

Mon El: "No. He speaks the truth."
  1. more than a month ago
  2. Supergirl Season 2
  3. # 11
  • Page :
  • 1


There are no replies made for this post yet.
Be one of the first to reply to this post!